How a Catholic Thinks They Get to Heaven

DTBM OnlineVideoTraining

Published on Dec 7, 2018

SUBSCRIBED 81K

For more of Dr. John Barnett's content go to DiscoverTheBook.org

Which Bible translation is the most accurate?

Calvary Bible Church

Published on Jul 23, 2015

SUBSCRIBED 2K

2014JUL13 - Q&A-72

The Best Of Origins - DARWIN - Part 1

Cornerstone Television Network

Published on Feb 11, 2019

SUBSCRIBED 14K

In this classic episode of Origins, host Donn Chapman is joined by Dr. Jerry Bergman to talk about the lasting legacy of Charles Darwin. His book ' The Darwin Effect ' is available in stores! Make sure to stay tuned for Part 2 of this exciting episode! Subscribe To Our Channel Today For More Great Videos! https://www.youtube.com/c/Cornerstone...

What "reliable" fossil record?

Wretched

Published on Jul 27, 2011

SUBSCRIBED 182K

See more at: http://www.wretchedradio.com

The Magnificent Giraffe | David Rives

David Rives Ministries

Published on Feb 5, 2019

SUBSCRIBED 5.7K

Is Giraffe neck result of natural selection and mutations or special design? SUBSCRIBE FOR MORE VIDEOS EVERY TUESDAY Haters beware: The information contained in this video doesn't fit the atheistic belief system. Give us a thumbs-up if you want to be able to hate more content like this! https://davidrives.com for more information Twitter @TheDavidRives

Origins: Orphan Genes Puzzle

Cornerstone Television Network

Published on May 7, 2018

SUBSCRIBED 14K

Join Origins host Ray Heiple as he welcomes, Dr. Paul Nelson for, “Orphan Genes Puzzle.” Imagine having to assemble a dictionary of the English language – but every time you open a new book you find words that you've never seen before. Many of the words are unique, found only in that book, and nowhere else. Likewise in genetics, hundreds of thousands of new genes are being discovered by DNA sequencing, and their beginnings are a major puzzle.

Noah's Flood and Catastrophic Plate Tectonics (from Pangea to Today)

Genesis Apologetics

Published on Jul 20, 2018

SUBSCRIBED

Noah's flood occurred just thousands of years ago and wiped out all terrestrial life on earth, save just thousands of animal "kinds" and 8 people on the Ark. Catastrophic rifting resulted in cycling tsunamis that brought water and sediment onto land and resulted in the movement of the continents to their position today.

The Universe & Physics Fine-tuning

LoveYourNeighbour

Published on Apr 19, 2018

SUBSCRIBED 107

This video is about the unfathomably precise fine-tuning that is necessary for life to be possible. This fine-tuning is widely acknowledged by scientists and physicists from around the world.
Fred Hoyle (British astronomer): "A common sense interpretation of the facts suggests that a super-intellect has monkeyed with physics, as well as with chemistry and biology, and that there are no blind forces worth speaking about in nature. The numbers one calculates from the facts seem to me so overwhelming as to put this conclusion almost beyond question."
Arno Penzias (Nobel Prize in physics): "Astronomy leads us to a unique event, a universe which was created out of nothing, one with the very delicate balance needed to provide exactly the conditions required to permit life, and one which has an underlying, one might say, 'supernatural' plan."
Charles Townes (Nobel Prize winner, physicist): "Intelligent design, as one sees it from a scientific point of view, seems to be quite real. This is a very special universe - it's remarkable that it came out just this way. If the laws of physics weren't just the way they are, we couldn't be here at all. The sun couldn't be there, the laws of gravity and nuclear laws and magnetic theory, quantum mechanics, and so on, have to be just the way they are for us to be here."
Robert Jastrow (former theoretical physicist at NASA, chairman of NASA's Lunar Exploration Committee, and chief of NASA's Theoretical Division. Founding director of NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies): "Astronomers now find they have painted themselves into a corner because they have proven, by their own methods, that the world began abruptly in an act of creation... That there are what I or anyone would call supernatural forces at work is now, I think, a scientifically proven fact."
Freeman Dyson (theoretical physicist and mathematician): "The more I exam the universe and study the details of its architecture, the more evidence I find that the universe in some sense knew we were coming."
George Ellis (one of the world's leading cosmology theorists & winner of the 2004 Templeton Prize): "Amazing fine tuning occurs in the laws that make this (complexity) possible. Realization of the complexity of what is accomplished makes it very difficult not to use the word 'miraculous' without taking a stand as to the ontological status of the word."
Arthur Eddington (astrophysicist & mathematician): "The idea of a universal mind or Logos would be, I think, a fairly plausible inference from the present state of scientific theory."
Paul Davies (multiple award-winning physicist): "There is for me powerful evidence that there is something going on behind it all... It seems as though somebody has fine-tuned nature's numbers to make the Universe... The impression of design is overwhelming."
Michio Kaku (theoretical physicist): "It's shocking to find how many of the familiar constants of the universe lie within a very narrow band that makes life possible. If a single one of these accidents were altered, stars would never form, the universe would fly apart, DNA would not exist, life as we know it would be impossible, Earth would flip over or freeze, and so on."
Dr. Dennis Scania (director of Cambridge University Observatories): "If you change a little bit the laws of nature, or you change a little bit the constants of nature - like the charge on the electron - then the way the universe develops is so changed that it is very likely intelligent life would not have been able to develop."
This video originated from ReasonableFaith.org

Creationists Make Scientific Predictions | David Rives

David Rives MinistriesPublished on Jan 11, 2017

SUBSCRIBED 5.7K

SUBSCRIBE (above) for new inspirational videos! LIKE David’s FB page here: http://www.facebook.com/DavidRivesMin... FOLLOW us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/TheDavidRives VISIT our official website for tons of free information: http://www.davidrivesministries.org David Rives MUSIC: http://www.davidrivesmusic.com For the TBN show “Creation in the 21st Century”: http://www.creationinthe21stcentury.com 

David Rives is the host of "Creation in the 21st Century" on TBN, singer/songwriter, and author of the book "Wonders Without Number". Browse through our YouTube channel to be educated, entertained, and inspired - and don't forget to subscribe for new videos. Why should you believe in creation, and not evolution? I mean, scientifically speaking. 

Haven’t we proven that evolution is a fact? Many people claim that creationists can’t be real scientists because we don’t make testable predictions. Well, that’s simply not true. Creationists start with the Biblical record which provides the framework for research and we can make testable predictions based off of that framework. Here’s a great example. Around each planet in our solar system is a magnetic field. Earth’s is pretty important, and allows us to see the beautiful Aurora Borealis and Australis. But our magnetic field is winding down. It’s not as strong now as it was in the past. Actually, estimates show that in just 20,000 years our magnetic field would disappear. There are theories on how you might extend that, but they aren’t scientifically testable at this point. Now, other planets have magnetic fields too. 

One scientist, Dr. Russell Humphreys, who is a renowned physicist, (and also a Bible-believer) developed a theory to try and explain the strength of our magnetic field, as well as that of our neighboring planets. But instead of assuming millions of years of history, he took the 6,000 years described in the Bible and made a testable prediction. Before we knew the strengths of the magnetic fields of Uranus and Neptune, he modeled and predicted how strong their magnetic fields would be, based on 6,000 years of decay. When Voyager 2 travelled past these distant worlds and measured their magnetic fields… guess what? The evolutionary predictions based on a Big Bang timeframe were vastly off. 

However, it turned out that Dr. Humphrey’s research was nearly spot-on. Scientific validation of his prediction that he’d based on Biblical data. He had accurately predicted the magnetic fields of these planets before the space probes reached the planets. 

Magnetic fields simply don’t last billions of years and scientific evidence in our solar system seems to be readily dispelling old-Universe cosmology. Just one more scientific reason that you shouldn’t believe in evolutionary cosmology. It takes a LOT of faith. I’m David Rives, Truly, the Heavens Declare the Glory of God.

Answering an atheist 2019 01 30

How the Second Law of Thermodynamics Demonstrates the Universe Had a Beg...

Cold-Case Christianity with J. Warner WallacePublished on Aug 13, 2018

SUBSCRIBED 18K

In this clip from J. Warner Wallace’s longer talk on the existence of God from cosmological evidence (based on his book, God’s Crime Scene), J. Warner describes how the Second Law of Thermodynamics can help us make the case for God’s existence from cosmology.